---

The automotive industry has long operated on a fundamental assumption that once won, customers would return generation after generation to the same manufacturers that earned their trust. Families identified themselves through their vehicle choices, passing down preferences from parents to children like heirlooms. A household might be known as a “Chevrolet family” or devoted to a particular Japanese manufacturer, their driveways serving as monuments to decades of consistent purchasing decisions. That era, it appears, has decisively ended.

The data emerging from 2025 paints a picture of an industry in the midst of a profound consumer behavior shift, one that challenges the very foundation of how manufacturers and dealers have understood customer relationships for the better part of a century. Across both automotive and motorcycle markets, loyalty rates have fallen to levels that would have been unthinkable just five years ago, driven by a convergence of economic pressures, technological disruption, and fundamental changes in how consumers approach major purchases. For researchers conducting automotive research and customer research, these trends represent not merely a statistical anomaly but a structural transformation in market dynamics that demands serious examination.

The Numbers Tell an Unmistakable Story

Brand loyalty in the automotive sector has dropped below fifty percent for the first time in modern measurement history, falling to forty-nine percent across all nameplates and segments according to comprehensive transaction data analysis. This represents more than a percentage point decline from the previous year and marks a reversal of what had been gradual improvement following pandemic-era disruptions. The implications of this threshold crossing extend far beyond the symbolism of falling below the halfway mark. When fewer than half of customers return to their previous brand, the entire economics of customer acquisition and retention must be reconsidered.

The industry’s brand loyalty rate through mid-2025 stood at just over fifty-one percent, down nearly one and a half percentage points from the same period in 2024. This decline marks a reversal from last year’s rebound and highlights continued volatility in loyalty trends as the market continues to stabilize after years of pandemic-related disruptions. More concerning for manufacturers is that more than half of all tracked automotive companies experienced year-over-year loyalty declines of one percentage point or more during this period, suggesting the erosion is widespread rather than concentrated among a few struggling nameplaces.

The motorcycle and powersports segments tell a somewhat different story, though one that still reveals underlying fragility. Brand loyalty across motorcycle and powersports industry segments remained relatively stable in 2024, even climbing to nearly fifty-seven percent in February of that year, representing the highest loyalty rate for these segments since March 2020. This resilience, however, comes after the industry witnessed loyalty plummet during the pandemic years, and experts conducting motorcycle research understand that stability following such dramatic volatility should not be mistaken for strength. The motorcycle market’s recovery to pre-pandemic loyalty levels occurred against a backdrop of limited model availability and supply constraints that may have artificially supported brand retention by reducing competitive options.

What makes these figures particularly striking is their consistency across different research methodologies and data sources. Whether examining actual transaction records from dealerships, consumer survey responses, or registration data analysis, the pattern remains unmistakable. This is not a measurement artifact or statistical noise. The relationship between consumers and vehicle brands has fundamentally changed, and 2025 represents the year when that transformation became impossible to ignore.

The Price Imperative Reshapes Consumer Psychology

At the heart of this loyalty collapse sits a reality that automotive manufacturers have been slow to fully acknowledge: price has become the dominant consideration in vehicle purchasing decisions to a degree unprecedented in peacetime automotive history. Over half of consumers are either undecided about repurchasing the same brand or are unlikely to do so, while forty-three percent of consumers explicitly state that they would switch brands to secure a lower price. This represents a complete inversion of traditional brand-building assumptions, where emotional connection and trust were thought to insulate manufacturers from price-based competition.

The economic context driving this shift cannot be understated. Average new vehicle prices have climbed to approximately fifty thousand dollars, with some segments experiencing even more dramatic increases. A significant number of new car buyers are now paying more than one thousand dollars per month on their vehicle loans, while a growing share of car owners owe more on their vehicles than they are worth. Against this backdrop of financial strain, the luxury of brand loyalty becomes increasingly difficult to justify, particularly for younger consumers facing student debt, housing costs, and stagnant wage growth.

Product research conducted across consumer segments reveals that this price sensitivity manifests differently depending on market conditions and vehicle types. Depending on the market, consumers surveyed highlighted price, product quality, or performance as the top considerations when thinking about their next vehicle brand, though price increasingly dominates in markets facing economic pressure. The traditional hierarchy of purchasing factors, where brand reputation and perceived quality could command premium pricing, has been flattened by the sheer magnitude of vehicle costs relative to household incomes.

What distinguishes this moment from previous periods of price sensitivity is the permanence of the behavioral shift. Consumers who switch brands for economic reasons often discover that the competitive alternatives they had dismissed or overlooked for years actually meet or exceed their needs. This experiential learning breaks down the barriers of habit and assumption that had previously sustained loyalty even when rational economic analysis might have suggested otherwise. Each successful brand switch creates a consumer more likely to switch again, establishing a pattern of cross-shopping and comparison that becomes self-reinforcing over time.

For CSM International, this transformation in purchasing psychology represents a critical area for ongoing customer research and content analysis, as understanding the mechanisms driving these decisions becomes essential for manufacturers hoping to retain any meaningful share of repeat purchasers.

Tariffs Accelerate Market Volatility

The geopolitical dimensions of brand loyalty erosion added new complexity throughout 2025, as trade policies and tariff regimes introduced unprecedented uncertainty into the automotive marketplace. Tariffs have introduced greater volatility into new vehicle shopping behavior, with higher import duties, decreased purchase incentives, and pricing pressures contributing to reduced affordability and suggested reductions in brand loyalty, particularly in popular segments like compact SUVs. The impact extends beyond simple price increases to create fundamental questions about value propositions and competitive positioning.

Higher tariffs have added significant strain on automotive manufacturers’ supply chains, with the global economy and the United States in particular relying heavily on automotive parts, semiconductors, and vehicles from Canada, Mexico, and China. To mitigate the risk of exorbitant vehicle prices at purchase and during production, automakers have been shifting sourcing and operations to maintain production and supply chains amidst great consumer uncertainty. This supply chain reorganization represents one of the largest industrial realignments in modern automotive history, with implications that will reverberate for decades.

The immediate consumer impact of these tariff policies became visible in purchasing patterns and brand defection rates. Last quarter, tariffs cost the automotive industry billions of dollars, with individual manufacturers reporting costs ranging from several hundred million to over one and a half billion dollars. For the majority of automakers, they are taking the tariffs on their financial statements rather than immediately passing costs to consumers, though this absorption cannot continue indefinitely. This temporary cushioning created a window during which consumers rushed to make purchases before anticipated price increases, distorting normal market patterns and creating artificial spikes in demand followed by sharp contractions.

Competitive research reveals that tariff impacts have been highly uneven across manufacturers and model lineups, creating new competitive dynamics that further erode traditional brand loyalties. Manufacturers heavily dependent on imported components or vehicles face different cost structures than those with primarily domestic production, fundamentally altering value propositions that had been stable for years. In September, tariffs on Japanese cars and parts were reduced to fifteen percent, down significantly from previous levels, placing pressure on European manufacturers and prompting companies to plan increased local production to manage tariff exposure. These differential impacts mean that the relative positioning of brands shifts not based on product improvements or deterioration but on regulatory frameworks entirely outside consumer consideration sets.

The psychological impact of tariff uncertainty may prove even more significant than the direct economic effects. When consumers cannot predict whether prices will rise or fall, whether incentives will expand or contract, or whether their preferred brands will remain competitively priced, the rational response is to shop broadly and minimize commitment to any particular manufacturer. This uncertainty-driven behavior directly undermines loyalty, as consumers learn to treat each purchase decision as independent rather than as part of an ongoing relationship with a trusted brand.

The Electric Vehicle Loyalty Paradox

Perhaps nowhere is the loyalty crisis more acute than in the electric vehicle segment, where the confluence of new technology, policy uncertainty, and rapid competitive evolution has created extraordinarily fluid consumer behavior. Specific manufacturers that had dominated electric vehicle loyalty, holding market-leading positions with loyalty rates exceeding sixty percent in 2024, have seen dramatic declines, falling to rates below fifty-five percent by mid-2025. Owners who had historically remained loyal to their electric vehicle brand nearly ninety percent of the time when replacing with another electric vehicle are now only seventy-five percent loyal, increasingly choosing competitive offerings.

This collapse in electric vehicle brand loyalty reflects the maturation of the segment from a niche market dominated by a single manufacturer to a genuinely competitive landscape with dozens of compelling alternatives. Early electric vehicle adopters often accepted limitations and compromises because few options existed. Today’s electric vehicle buyers face an embarrassment of riches, with new models launching monthly and established manufacturers finally delivering products that match or exceed the capabilities of early market leaders. The competitive moat that first-mover advantage provided has been filled in remarkably quickly.

Among mass-market vehicles, customers show significantly different satisfaction levels between powertrains, with hybrid vehicles rating at eighty, traditional gasoline vehicles matching that score, but electric vehicles dipping to just sixty-eight. In the luxury segment, hybrids score eighty-three, exceeding both gasoline vehicles at eighty and electric vehicles at seventy-eight. These satisfaction gaps suggest that many electric vehicle owners are discovering that the technology does not yet fully meet their expectations, creating fertile ground for brand switching when replacement time arrives.

The policy environment surrounding electric vehicles adds another layer of uncertainty that discourages brand loyalty. For manufacturers with large electric vehicle portfolios, the effect of federal tax credits expiring has had significant impact on brand loyalty, as the seven-thousand-five-hundred-dollar incentive represented a substantial portion of many vehicles’ value propositions. When government policy can add or subtract thousands of dollars from a vehicle’s effective price with the stroke of a pen, consumers rationally focus on immediate economics rather than long-term brand relationships. The boom-and-bust cycles created by incentive program launches and terminations train consumers to time markets and chase deals rather than remain loyal to manufacturers.

Range anxiety, charging infrastructure limitations, and cold-weather performance concerns continue to plague electric vehicle ownership experiences, creating disappointment that fuels brand switching. Driving range emerged as among the lowest-scoring aspects of vehicle ownership, with electric vehicles rating particularly poorly at sixty-four compared to seventy-four for gasoline vehicles and seventy-seven for hybrids. When owners feel their current vehicle has failed to deliver on fundamental promises, the emotional connection necessary for loyalty cannot form regardless of manufacturer marketing efforts.

Segment Switching Breaks Traditional Loyalty Patterns

Beyond simple brand-to-brand defection, an even more profound shift is occurring as consumers increasingly switch between vehicle segments with each purchase, breaking patterns that had been remarkably stable for decades. Buyer loyalty tends to weaken dramatically when shifting to a different vehicle segment. Sedan return-to-market brand loyalty has fallen from over fifty percent a decade ago to just thirty-seven percent today, meaning nearly two out of every three sedan owners are opting for a different body style in their next purchase.

This segment fluidity reflects the transformation of the American automotive marketplace over the past fifteen years, as utility vehicles have progressively consumed market share previously held by traditional passenger cars. The sport utility body style leads with a loyalty score of seventy-five percent, the only style above fifty percent, with pickup trucks second at forty-nine percent. The implication is profound: even when customers remain loyal to a brand, they are shopping different portions of the manufacturer’s lineup, comparing against different competitors, and evaluating different criteria than they did with their previous purchase.

For manufacturers, segment switching presents challenges that pure brand loyalty programs cannot address. A customer who purchased a sedan from a particular manufacturer and now seeks a large SUV enters the market with fundamentally different priorities and faces a completely different competitive set. The emotional connection to their previous sedan provides little protection against defection if a competitor offers a more compelling utility vehicle. Traditional loyalty metrics, focused on whether customers repurchase the same brand, mask this deeper instability in how customers relate to manufacturer product portfolios.

The proliferation of new vehicle segments and sub-segments accelerates this trend. Over sixty new vehicle launches are slated for 2025, with thirty-six of these being SUV models, including twenty standalone battery-electric utility vehicles. Each new segment created represents another opportunity for consumers to reconsider their brand preferences in a fresh context. The customer who never considered switching brands when shopping within the sedan category may find themselves evaluating five or six different manufacturers when entering the electric crossover segment for the first time.

Content analysis of consumer shopping behavior reveals that segment switching often precedes brand switching by one vehicle cycle. A customer who moves from a sedan to an SUV while staying with their current brand has demonstrated willingness to reconsider fundamental assumptions about what they need in a vehicle. When replacement time arrives for that SUV, they have already broken from pattern once and are statistically more likely to break pattern again by switching brands entirely.

The Aggressive Incentive Arms Race

In response to weakening loyalty and intensifying competition, manufacturers have turned to increasingly aggressive incentive programs that further undermine brand relationships even as they temporarily boost sales volumes. Changing market conditions, including increased availability of models, varying age of products, and more aggressive incentive offers, have brought brand loyalty back below fifty percent. The typical price increase of new vehicles of nearly two thousand dollars due to various market factors has been partially offset by manufacturers offering aggressive incentive programs to tempt buyers.

These incentive programs create a destructive cycle that erodes the very loyalty manufacturers hope to preserve. When customers learn that waiting for the end-of-quarter sales push or holding out for manufacturer discounts yields thousands of dollars in savings, they rationally delay purchases and shop more broadly. The manufacturer that “trains” its customers to expect generous incentives finds those customers increasingly unwilling to pay full price, while customers of competing brands see attractive offers and reconsider their loyalty. What begins as a tactical response to weak demand becomes a strategic trap from which escape proves difficult.

The competitive dynamics of incentive spending particularly harm manufacturers attempting to maintain premium positioning. As car prices increase, data indicate that luxury customers are becoming more price sensitive. In this economic climate, the ability to compete on both quality and value has become critical to retention and customer satisfaction. Luxury manufacturers that historically commanded loyalty through brand prestige and ownership experience find themselves forced to offer discounts that undermine their premium positioning, while mass-market manufacturers must spend even more aggressively to compete, creating a downward spiral in profitability across the industry.

The transparency provided by internet pricing information amplifies incentive impacts. Customers can instantly compare offers across dozens of manufacturers and dealers, seeing precisely which brands are “hungry” and offering the most aggressive deals. This information asymmetry favored manufacturers when consumers had limited ability to comparison shop; today it works against them as every incentive program becomes immediately visible to all potential customers regardless of brand preference. Competitive research indicates that manufacturers offering significant incentives on one model often see those incentives used as negotiating leverage by customers shopping entirely different segments or brands.

For CSM International’s work in automotive research, understanding the long-term consequences of incentive dependency represents a critical research priority, as manufacturers grapple with how to reverse patterns of customer behavior that have become deeply entrenched.

Digital Transformation and the Erosion of Dealer Relationships

The shift toward digital vehicle shopping and the declining role of traditional dealer relationships in building brand loyalty represents another structural change reshaping consumer behavior in 2025. Growing interest has emerged among consumers who want to purchase vehicles directly from manufacturers via an online process, with nearly half of surveyed consumers indicating interest in such direct purchases in 2025, up dramatically from just over one-third in 2024. A substantial portion of respondents indicate they would consider switching automotive brands if the online experience with their current brand failed to meet expectations.

This digital transformation fundamentally alters the mechanisms through which loyalty was historically built and maintained. The traditional dealership experience, whatever its flaws, created human relationships between customers and sales or service personnel that provided personal reasons to return to a particular brand. A customer might remain loyal partly because they trusted their service advisor or enjoyed working with a particular salesperson who understood their needs. Digital purchasing removes these interpersonal connections, reducing brands to combinations of features, specifications, and prices that can be evaluated dispassionately through comparison spreadsheets.

The democratization of information that digital platforms enable further weakens brand loyalty by making every detail of every vehicle instantly comparable. Customers who once relied on manufacturer marketing or dealer representations can now access detailed specifications, owner reviews, reliability data, and competitive comparisons before ever contacting a dealer or manufacturer. This information availability reduces the knowledge advantage that traditionally allowed dealers to steer customers toward preferred brands and increases the likelihood that customers will discover competitive alternatives that better meet their objective needs.

Younger consumers particularly embrace digital purchasing models, creating a generational shift in how brand relationships form. Generationally, thirty-four percent of younger respondents indicated willingness to fully order their next vehicle online without any physical dealership touchpoints, compared with just nineteen percent of respondents ages forty-five and over. As these digital-native consumers become increasingly dominant in the market, the traditional loyalty-building mechanisms become progressively less effective, requiring fundamental reconsideration of how manufacturers cultivate long-term customer relationships.

The fragmentation of the vehicle shopping journey across multiple digital touchpoints also complicates loyalty building. Customers may research on manufacturer websites, compare prices on third-party platforms, read reviews on automotive publications, watch videos on social media, and arrange financing through online banks, all before making any contact with a specific brand or dealer. Each touchpoint represents an opportunity for competitive intrusion, as algorithms serve advertisements for alternatives and comparison tools highlight competitor advantages. The integrated, controlled experience that dealerships once provided has dissolved into a complex ecosystem where maintaining customer attention and preference requires constant engagement across dozens of channels.

Motorcycle Market Resilience Masks Underlying Vulnerabilities

While motorcycle and powersports segments have shown more resilience in loyalty metrics than their automotive counterparts, deeper analysis reveals vulnerabilities that suggest this stability may prove temporary. The motorcycle and powersports industry measured a loyalty low of just over fifty percent in June 2022, down from a high of over sixty percent in October 2016, before recovering to nearly fifty-seven percent in 2024. This volatility demonstrates that motorcycle loyalty, while currently stronger than automotive loyalty, remains susceptible to the same market forces and competitive dynamics.

The motorcycle market’s smaller scale and different competitive dynamics create both advantages and disadvantages for loyalty maintenance. On one hand, motorcycle purchases more often reflect lifestyle choices and emotional connections rather than purely practical transportation needs, potentially creating stronger brand attachments. Motorcycle owners frequently identify with particular brands’ cultures and communities in ways that car buyers rarely do, joining brand-specific riding clubs, attending manufacturer-sponsored events, and displaying brand loyalty through apparel and accessories. This cultural dimension provides insulation against purely price-based competition.

On the other hand, the motorcycle market’s limited volume means manufacturers have fewer resources to invest in loyalty programs, customer relationship management, and experience enhancement. The product development cycles in motorcycles tend to be longer than in automotive, meaning customers may wait years for updated versions of their preferred models while competitors introduce new alternatives. The domestic motorcycle market has shifted in recent years toward middleweight and entry-level sport motorcycles rather than thousand-cubic-centimeter superbikes, with buyers in 2025 placing equal importance on price, insurance costs, and modern rider aids alongside traditional virtues of speed and acceleration. This shift toward practical considerations and away from pure performance suggests that motorcycle buyers are becoming more like car buyers in their purchasing psychology, which bodes poorly for future loyalty trends.

The growth of adventure motorcycle and dual-sport segments, which prioritize versatility over brand-specific character, further threatens traditional loyalty patterns. Adventure and dual-purpose motorcycle sales have increased for seven consecutive years through 2025, as these bikes designed to handle both on-road and off-road riding align with rising interest in outdoor recreation. These utility-focused segments attract customers with different priorities than traditional brand loyalists, customers more likely to cross-shop extensively and prioritize specifications over heritage.

Electric motorcycle development, while still nascent compared to automotive electrification, represents another potential loyalty disruptor. Electric motorcycle sales have increased approximately eighteen percent year-over-year, though from small volumes, with manufacturers focusing on creating experiences that feel premium and cutting-edge. As electric motorcycles become more viable alternatives to traditional combustion models, customers will reevaluate their brand preferences in a context where historical advantages in engine development and sound character become irrelevant.

The Global Dimension of Loyalty Collapse

While this analysis has focused primarily on developed markets, particularly the United States, global patterns reveal that loyalty erosion is a worldwide phenomenon with local variations that illuminate broader dynamics. The percentage of surveyed consumers intending to switch brands the next time they are in-market for a vehicle increased on a year-over-year basis across several markets globally, signaling the need to build stronger customer relationships, particularly in developing markets with significant percentages of first-time buyers.

Developing markets present unique loyalty challenges, as many customers have no historical brand relationship to maintain. First-time vehicle buyers approach the market without preconceptions or family traditions to honor, making purely rational evaluations based on current product offerings, pricing, and value propositions. Brand affinity for domestic automakers is strongest among surveyed consumers in Japan, while it is least prevalent in Southeast Asia and the United Kingdom, underscoring the complexity and diversity of the competitive landscape across global markets. This variation suggests that loyalty is not an inherent feature of vehicle ownership but rather a culturally constructed phenomenon that can strengthen or weaken based on market conditions and consumer experiences.

The rapid rise of manufacturers from developing markets, particularly from China and other Asian countries, introduces competitive dynamics that established manufacturers struggle to counter with loyalty appeals. These emerging competitors often offer substantially lower prices, rapidly improving quality, and features that match or exceed traditional manufacturers, all without the burden of maintaining expensive legacy dealer networks and customer relationship programs. For customers without strong brand preferences, these new entrants represent compelling alternatives that accelerate loyalty erosion for established manufacturers across global markets.

Globalization of information through digital channels means that consumers in one market can instantly access reviews, pricing information, and ownership experiences from consumers worldwide, reducing the ability of manufacturers to maintain different brand positions or value propositions in different regions. A manufacturer that maintains premium pricing in developed markets while offering aggressive discounts in developing markets risks alienating customers in both markets when this information asymmetry becomes visible. This transparency forces more consistent global positioning that often means sacrificing some loyalty advantage in certain markets.

What CSM International Research Reveals About the Path Forward

The comprehensive customer research and competitive research conducted by CSM International on these trends points toward several potential paths forward for manufacturers hoping to rebuild loyalty in this transformed landscape. First, the traditional conception of brand loyalty as an emotional, long-term relationship built through accumulated positive experiences must evolve to acknowledge that modern consumers view each purchase decision as more independent and transactional. Loyalty programs focusing on rewards for repeat purchase may prove less effective than programs that continuously demonstrate value and relevance throughout the ownership experience.

Second, product research indicates that manufacturers must compete more aggressively on total value proposition rather than relying on brand heritage or past relationships to justify premium pricing. The customers who remain willing to pay premiums for trusted brands represent a shrinking portion of the market, while the growing majority shop based on current product capabilities, pricing, and features regardless of their previous purchase history. This requires fundamental rethinking of pricing strategies, incentive programs, and positioning.

Third, the erosion of segment loyalty means that manufacturers can no longer assume that strong loyalty in one category will translate to other parts of their portfolio. A customer who loved their sedan cannot be counted on to even consider the same manufacturer’s SUVs or trucks unless those products genuinely compete with best-in-class alternatives. This demands more balanced product portfolios and investment in excellence across segments rather than focusing resources on traditional strength areas.

Fourth, the digital transformation of vehicle shopping requires manufacturers to excel in online experiences, information transparency, and seamless multichannel engagement rather than relying on dealer relationships to maintain customer connections. The customer who can complete their entire purchase journey online without human interaction represents the future, and manufacturers that fail to serve this customer preference will see continued loyalty erosion regardless of product quality.

The fundamental reality that emerges from this research is that brand loyalty, as it was understood for generations in the automotive and motorcycle industries, has died or is in irreversible decline. What replaces it may still be called loyalty, but it will function differently, require different investments to maintain, and prove far more fragile than the deep emotional connections that once bound families to particular manufacturers across decades. Manufacturers that acknowledge this transformation and adapt their strategies accordingly will weather the transition; those that continue to assume loyalty will naturally follow from good products and past relationships will find themselves increasingly unable to retain customers in an era when every purchase decision begins anew.

The year 2025 will likely be remembered as the inflection point when this transformation became undeniable, when the data made clear that the old assumptions no longer held and new approaches had become imperative. For organizations like CSM International engaged in automotive research, motorcycle research, and customer research, the coming years will require continuous monitoring of how this evolution unfolds and what strategies prove effective in building whatever form of customer loyalty remains possible in this transformed marketplace. The death of traditional brand loyalty opens questions about what will rise to replace it, and the answers to those questions will define the automotive industry for the generation to come.

Note: This analysis draws on extensive competitive research, content analysis, and product research examining consumer behavior patterns across automotive and motorcycle markets in 2025. For more insights on evolving market dynamics, visit csm-research.com.